2003 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2002 Mazda AZ
To start off, 2003 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mazda AZ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mazda AZ would be higher. At 3,934 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 995 kg more than 2002 Mazda AZ.
Because 2002 Mazda AZ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Ford Thunderbird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mazda AZ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Ford Thunderbird has automatic transmission and 2002 Mazda AZ has manual transmission. 2002 Mazda AZ will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Ford Thunderbird will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford Thunderbird | 2002 Mazda AZ | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Thunderbird | AZ |
Year Released | 2003 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3934 cc | 657 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 249 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1745 kg | 750 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2370 mm |