2003 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2012 Chevrolet Captiva
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 3,934 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva (253 HP) has 4 more horse power than 2003 Ford Thunderbird. (249 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Thunderbird.
Because 2012 Chevrolet Captiva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Ford Thunderbird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford Thunderbird (388 Nm) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Chevrolet Captiva. (288 Nm). This means 2003 Ford Thunderbird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Chevrolet Captiva.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford Thunderbird | 2012 Chevrolet Captiva | |
Make | Ford | Chevrolet |
Model | Thunderbird | Captiva |
Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3934 cc | 2997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 249 HP | 253 HP |
Torque | 388 Nm | 288 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4673 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1849 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1756 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2707 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 65 L |