2003 Ford Windstar vs. 2012 Fiat Bravo
To start off, 2012 Fiat Bravo is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford Windstar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford Windstar would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Ford Windstar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Windstar (150 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 2012 Fiat Bravo. (128 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Windstar should accelerate faster than 2012 Fiat Bravo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Ford Windstar | 2012 Fiat Bravo | |
| Make | Ford | Fiat |
| Model | Windstar | Bravo |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3000 cc | 1747 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 5103 mm | 4340 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1946 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1679 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3066 mm | 2610 mm |
