2003 Ginetta G40 vs. 2012 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2012 Toyota Matrix is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ginetta G40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ginetta G40 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2003 Ginetta G40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Ginetta G40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Toyota Matrix, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Toyota Matrix has automatic transmission and 2003 Ginetta G40 has manual transmission. 2003 Ginetta G40 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Toyota Matrix will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ginetta G40 | 2012 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Ginetta | Toyota |
Model | G40 | Matrix |
Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1986 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 158 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 110 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2601 mm |