2003 GMC Safari vs. 2001 Mazda CU-X
To start off, 2003 GMC Safari is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mazda CU-X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mazda CU-X would be higher. At 4,292 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 GMC Safari is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 GMC Safari (187 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (99 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 GMC Safari should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda CU-X. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 GMC Safari weights approximately 610 kg more than 2001 Mazda CU-X. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 GMC Safari is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 GMC Safari. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mazda CU-X, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 GMC Safari (338 Nm) has 98 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (240 Nm). This means 2003 GMC Safari will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Mazda CU-X.
Compare all specifications:
2003 GMC Safari | 2001 Mazda CU-X | |
Make | GMC | Mazda |
Model | Safari | CU-X |
Year Released | 2003 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4292 cc | 1970 cc |
Horse Power | 187 HP | 99 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 338 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1955 kg | 1345 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 80 L |