2003 GMC Sierra vs. 2010 Volvo C30
To start off, 2010 Volvo C30 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 GMC Sierra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 GMC Sierra would be higher. At 4,816 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 GMC Sierra (275 HP) has 174 more horse power than 2010 Volvo C30. (101 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 GMC Sierra should accelerate faster than 2010 Volvo C30. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 GMC Sierra weights approximately 494 kg more than 2010 Volvo C30. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 GMC Sierra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 GMC Sierra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volvo C30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 GMC Sierra | 2010 Volvo C30 | |
| Make | GMC | Volvo |
| Model | Sierra | C30 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4816 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 275 HP | 101 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1945 kg | 1451 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4252 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1783 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1448 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3380 mm | 2639 mm |
