2003 GMC Sierra vs. 2012 Ford F-250
To start off, 2012 Ford F-250 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 GMC Sierra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 GMC Sierra would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford F-250 (385 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 2003 GMC Sierra. (321 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 2003 GMC Sierra.
Because 2003 GMC Sierra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Ford F-250. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 GMC Sierra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Ford F-250 (548 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 178 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 GMC Sierra. (370 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2012 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 GMC Sierra.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 GMC Sierra | 2012 Ford F-250 | |
| Make | GMC | Ford |
| Model | Sierra | F-250 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5967 cc | 6200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 321 HP | 385 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 370 Nm | 548 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 6269 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 2029 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1966 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3650 mm | 3967 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 117 L | 132 L |
