2003 GMC Sierra vs. 2012 Ford F-250
To start off, 2012 Ford F-250 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 GMC Sierra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 GMC Sierra would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford F-250 (385 HP) has 110 more horse power than 2003 GMC Sierra. (275 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 2003 GMC Sierra.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Ford F-250 (548 Nm) has 162 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 GMC Sierra. (386 Nm). This means 2012 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 GMC Sierra. 2012 Ford F-250 has automatic transmission and 2003 GMC Sierra has manual transmission. 2003 GMC Sierra will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Ford F-250 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 GMC Sierra | 2012 Ford F-250 | |
Make | GMC | Ford |
Model | Sierra | F-250 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
Body Type | Pickup | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4816 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 275 HP | 385 HP |
Torque | 386 Nm | 548 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 6269 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 2029 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1966 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3380 mm | 3967 mm |