2003 GMC Sierra vs. 2013 Cadillac ATS

To start off, 2013 Cadillac ATS is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 GMC Sierra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 GMC Sierra would be higher. At 4,816 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac ATS (317 HP) has 42 more horse power than 2003 GMC Sierra. (275 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ATS should accelerate faster than 2003 GMC Sierra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 GMC Sierra weights approximately 375 kg more than 2013 Cadillac ATS.

Because 2013 Cadillac ATS is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 GMC Sierra. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ATS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 GMC Sierra (386 Nm) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Cadillac ATS. (373 Nm). This means 2003 GMC Sierra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Cadillac ATS. 2013 Cadillac ATS has automatic transmission and 2003 GMC Sierra has manual transmission. 2003 GMC Sierra will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Cadillac ATS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: