2003 Holden Barina vs. 1952 Riley RM A
To start off, 2003 Holden Barina is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Riley RM A would be higher. At 1,496 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Riley RM A is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Riley RM A weights approximately 175 kg more than 2003 Holden Barina.
Because 1952 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Holden Barina, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Holden Barina | 1952 Riley RM A | |
Make | Holden | Riley |
Model | Barina | RM A |
Year Released | 2003 | 1952 |
Engine Size | 1387 cc | 1496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1060 kg | 1235 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3820 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2870 mm |