2003 Holden Barina vs. 1962 Holden EK
To start off, 2003 Holden Barina is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Holden EK would be higher. At 2,260 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Holden EK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Holden Barina (89 HP) has 25 more horse power than 1962 Holden EK. (64 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Holden Barina should accelerate faster than 1962 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 1962 Holden EK (164 Nm) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Holden Barina. (120 Nm). This means 1962 Holden EK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Holden Barina.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Holden Barina | 1962 Holden EK | |
Make | Holden | Holden |
Model | Barina | EK |
Year Released | 2003 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1387 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 64 HP |
Torque | 120 Nm | 164 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |