2003 Holden Cruze vs. 1963 Jeep CJ5

To start off, 2003 Holden Cruze is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Holden Cruze (72 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1963 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 1963 Jeep CJ5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Jeep CJ5 weights approximately 47 kg more than 2003 Holden Cruze.

Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Jeep CJ5 (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Holden Cruze. (138 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1963 Jeep CJ5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Holden Cruze.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Holden Cruze 1963 Jeep CJ5
Make Holden Jeep
Model Cruze CJ5
Year Released 2003 1963
Body Type Hatchback SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1490 cc 2199 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 72 HP 59 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 3600 RPM
Torque 138 Nm 145 Nm
Torque RPM 4500 RPM 3600 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 985 kg 1032 kg
Vehicle Length 3630 mm 3520 mm
Vehicle Width 1650 mm 1550 mm
Vehicle Height 1610 mm 1740 mm
Wheelbase Size 2370 mm 2060 mm