2003 Holden Cruze vs. 2010 Ford E-350
To start off, 2010 Ford E-350 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Holden Cruze. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Holden Cruze would be higher. At 5,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford E-350 (177 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 2003 Holden Cruze. (72 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 2003 Holden Cruze.
Because 2003 Holden Cruze is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Ford E-350. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Holden Cruze will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford E-350 (184 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Holden Cruze. (138 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2010 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Holden Cruze.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Holden Cruze | 2010 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Holden | Ford |
Model | Cruze | E-350 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1490 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 138 Nm | 184 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4437 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2619 mm |