2003 Holden Jackaroo vs. 2002 MCC Smart
To start off, 2003 Holden Jackaroo is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 MCC Smart. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 MCC Smart would be higher. At 3,494 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Holden Jackaroo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Holden Jackaroo (212 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 2002 MCC Smart. (80 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Holden Jackaroo should accelerate faster than 2002 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Holden Jackaroo weights approximately 1130 kg more than 2002 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Holden Jackaroo (310 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 200 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 MCC Smart. (110 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2003 Holden Jackaroo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 MCC Smart.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Holden Jackaroo | 2002 MCC Smart | |
Make | Holden | MCC |
Model | Jackaroo | Smart |
Year Released | 2003 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 3494 cc | 698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 212 HP | 80 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 310 Nm | 110 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Vehicle Weight | 1920 kg | 790 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 3430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2370 mm |