2003 Holden Rodeo vs. 1964 Jeep CJ5
To start off, 2003 Holden Rodeo is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 3,494 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Holden Rodeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Holden Rodeo (145 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 1964 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Holden Rodeo should accelerate faster than 1964 Jeep CJ5.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Holden Rodeo (280 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 135 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Jeep CJ5. (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2003 Holden Rodeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Jeep CJ5.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Holden Rodeo | 1964 Jeep CJ5 | |
Make | Holden | Jeep |
Model | Rodeo | CJ5 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3494 cc | 2197 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 145 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 280 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 3520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 2060 mm |