2003 Holden Rodeo vs. 1965 NSU 1000
To start off, 2003 Holden Rodeo is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 NSU 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 NSU 1000 would be higher. At 3,494 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Holden Rodeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Holden Rodeo (145 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 1965 NSU 1000. (43 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Holden Rodeo should accelerate faster than 1965 NSU 1000.
Because 2003 Holden Rodeo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 NSU 1000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Holden Rodeo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Holden Rodeo (280 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 209 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 NSU 1000. (71 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2003 Holden Rodeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 NSU 1000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Holden Rodeo | 1965 NSU 1000 | |
| Make | Holden | NSU |
| Model | Rodeo | 1000 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3494 cc | 996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 145 HP | 43 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 280 Nm | 71 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 3800 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1500 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 2260 mm |
