2003 Holden Rodeo vs. 1967 Mini MK I
To start off, 2003 Holden Rodeo is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mini MK I. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mini MK I would be higher. At 3,494 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Holden Rodeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Holden Rodeo (145 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 1967 Mini MK I. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Holden Rodeo should accelerate faster than 1967 Mini MK I.
Because 2003 Holden Rodeo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Mini MK I. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Holden Rodeo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Holden Rodeo (280 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 220 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Mini MK I. (60 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2003 Holden Rodeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Mini MK I.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Holden Rodeo | 1967 Mini MK I | |
| Make | Holden | Mini |
| Model | Rodeo | MK I |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3494 cc | 848 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 145 HP | 34 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 280 Nm | 60 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 3060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1420 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 2040 mm |
