2003 Holden Rodeo vs. 1972 Mazda 818
To start off, 2003 Holden Rodeo is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda 818. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda 818 would be higher. At 3,494 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Holden Rodeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Holden Rodeo (145 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 1972 Mazda 818. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Holden Rodeo should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda 818.
Because 2003 Holden Rodeo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Mazda 818. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Holden Rodeo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Holden Rodeo (280 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 156 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda 818. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2003 Holden Rodeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda 818.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Holden Rodeo | 1972 Mazda 818 | |
| Make | Holden | Mazda |
| Model | Rodeo | 818 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3494 cc | 1586 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 145 HP | 79 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 280 Nm | 124 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4100 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 2320 mm |
