2003 Holden Rodeo vs. 1995 Mazda RX-01
To start off, 2003 Holden Rodeo is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mazda RX-01. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mazda RX-01 would be higher. At 3,494 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Holden Rodeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Mazda RX-01 (220 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 2003 Holden Rodeo. (145 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Mazda RX-01 should accelerate faster than 2003 Holden Rodeo.
Because 2003 Holden Rodeo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Mazda RX-01. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Holden Rodeo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Holden Rodeo (280 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mazda RX-01. (216 Nm @ 6000 RPM). This means 2003 Holden Rodeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mazda RX-01.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Holden Rodeo | 1995 Mazda RX-01 | |
| Make | Holden | Mazda |
| Model | Rodeo | RX-01 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3494 cc | 2614 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 145 HP | 220 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 8500 RPM |
| Torque | 280 Nm | 216 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1250 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 2350 mm |
