2003 Holden Rodeo vs. 2010 Citroen C1
To start off, 2010 Citroen C1 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Holden Rodeo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Holden Rodeo would be higher. At 3,494 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Holden Rodeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Holden Rodeo (145 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 2010 Citroen C1. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Holden Rodeo should accelerate faster than 2010 Citroen C1.
Because 2003 Holden Rodeo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Citroen C1. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Holden Rodeo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Holden Rodeo (280 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 187 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Citroen C1. (93 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2003 Holden Rodeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Citroen C1.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Holden Rodeo | 2010 Citroen C1 | |
Make | Holden | Citroen |
Model | Rodeo | C1 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3494 cc | 998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 145 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 280 Nm | 93 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 3440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 2350 mm |