2003 Holden Rodeo vs. 2010 Renault Clio
To start off, 2010 Renault Clio is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Holden Rodeo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Holden Rodeo would be higher. At 3,494 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Holden Rodeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Holden Rodeo (145 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 2010 Renault Clio. (81 HP @ 3750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Holden Rodeo should accelerate faster than 2010 Renault Clio.
Because 2003 Holden Rodeo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Holden Rodeo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Holden Rodeo (280 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Renault Clio. (200 Nm @ 1900 RPM). This means 2003 Holden Rodeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Holden Rodeo | 2010 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Holden | Renault |
| Model | Rodeo | Clio |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3494 cc | 1460 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 145 HP | 81 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 3750 RPM |
| Torque | 280 Nm | 200 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 3990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1710 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 2580 mm |
