2003 Holden Rodeo vs. 2012 Nissan Murano CrossCabriolet
To start off, 2012 Nissan Murano CrossCabriolet is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Holden Rodeo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Holden Rodeo would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Nissan Murano CrossCabriolet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Nissan Murano CrossCabriolet (265 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 2003 Holden Rodeo. (145 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Murano CrossCabriolet should accelerate faster than 2003 Holden Rodeo.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Nissan Murano CrossCabriolet (336 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Holden Rodeo. (280 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2012 Nissan Murano CrossCabriolet will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Holden Rodeo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Holden Rodeo | 2012 Nissan Murano CrossCabriolet | |
| Make | Holden | Nissan |
| Model | Rodeo | Murano CrossCabriolet |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3494 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 145 HP | 265 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 280 Nm | 336 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4829 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1892 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1681 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 2824 mm |
