2003 Holden Statesman vs. 1995 Mazda RX-01

To start off, 2003 Holden Statesman is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mazda RX-01. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mazda RX-01 would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Holden Statesman is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Mazda RX-01 (220 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 2003 Holden Statesman. (204 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Mazda RX-01 should accelerate faster than 2003 Holden Statesman. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Holden Statesman weights approximately 590 kg more than 1995 Mazda RX-01.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Holden Statesman (305 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 89 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mazda RX-01. (216 Nm @ 6000 RPM). This means 2003 Holden Statesman will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mazda RX-01. 2003 Holden Statesman has automatic transmission and 1995 Mazda RX-01 has manual transmission. 1995 Mazda RX-01 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Holden Statesman will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: