2003 Holden UTE vs. 1951 Jeep CJ3A

To start off, 2003 Holden UTE is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Holden UTE (204 HP) has 145 more horse power than 1951 Jeep CJ3A. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1951 Jeep CJ3A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Holden UTE weights approximately 390 kg more than 1951 Jeep CJ3A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1951 Jeep CJ3A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Holden UTE. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1951 Jeep CJ3A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Holden UTE (305 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 160 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Jeep CJ3A. (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2003 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Jeep CJ3A.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Holden UTE 1951 Jeep CJ3A
Make Holden Jeep
Model UTE CJ3A
Year Released 2003 1951
Body Type Pickup SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3791 cc 2199 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 204 HP 59 HP
Torque 305 Nm 145 Nm
Torque RPM 3600 RPM 3600 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Vehicle Weight 1500 kg 1110 kg
Vehicle Length 5060 mm 3130 mm
Vehicle Width 1850 mm 1460 mm
Vehicle Height 1490 mm 1630 mm
Wheelbase Size 2950 mm 2040 mm