2003 Holden UTE vs. 1962 Renault 8
To start off, 2003 Holden UTE is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Renault 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Renault 8 would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Holden UTE (204 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 157 more horse power than 1962 Renault 8. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1962 Renault 8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Holden UTE weights approximately 760 kg more than 1962 Renault 8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Holden UTE | 1962 Renault 8 | |
| Make | Holden | Renault |
| Model | UTE | 8 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 3791 cc | 956 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 204 HP | 47 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2280 mm |
