2003 Holden UTE vs. 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire
To start off, 2003 Holden UTE is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire would be higher. At 6,965 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire weights approximately 320 kg more than 2003 Holden UTE.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Holden UTE | 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire | |
| Make | Holden | Oldsmobile |
| Model | UTE | Starfire |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3791 cc | 6965 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 204 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 3130 mm |
