2003 Holden UTE vs. 2001 Seat Toledo

To start off, 2003 Holden UTE is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Seat Toledo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Seat Toledo would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Holden UTE (204 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 2001 Seat Toledo. (168 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 2001 Seat Toledo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Holden UTE weights approximately 114 kg more than 2001 Seat Toledo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2003 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Seat Toledo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Holden UTE (305 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Seat Toledo. (220 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2003 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Seat Toledo.

Compare all specifications: