2003 Holden UTE vs. 2005 Jeep Cherokee
To start off, 2005 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Holden UTE. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Holden UTE would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Holden UTE (204 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 2005 Jeep Cherokee. (147 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 2005 Jeep Cherokee. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 364 kg more than 2003 Holden UTE.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Cherokee (360 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Holden UTE. (305 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2005 Jeep Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Holden UTE.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Holden UTE | 2005 Jeep Cherokee | |
| Make | Holden | Jeep |
| Model | UTE | Cherokee |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3791 cc | 2776 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 204 HP | 147 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Torque | 305 Nm | 360 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 1800 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1864 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2660 mm |
