2003 Holden UTE vs. 2008 Nissan X-Trail

To start off, 2008 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Holden UTE. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Holden UTE would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Holden UTE (204 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 2008 Nissan X-Trail. (134 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 2008 Nissan X-Trail. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 100 kg more than 2003 Holden UTE.

Because 2008 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Holden UTE. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Holden UTE (305 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Nissan X-Trail. (300 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2003 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Nissan X-Trail.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Holden UTE 2008 Nissan X-Trail
Make Holden Nissan
Model UTE X-Trail
Year Released 2003 2008
Body Type Pickup SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3791 cc 2184 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 204 HP 134 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 305 Nm 300 Nm
Torque RPM 3600 RPM 2000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1500 kg 1600 kg
Vehicle Length 5060 mm 4520 mm
Vehicle Width 1850 mm 1770 mm
Vehicle Height 1490 mm 1680 mm
Wheelbase Size 2950 mm 2630 mm