2003 Holden UTE vs. 2011 Honda Jazz

To start off, 2011 Honda Jazz is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Holden UTE. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Holden UTE would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Holden UTE (204 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 2011 Honda Jazz. (118 HP @ 6600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 2011 Honda Jazz.

Because 2003 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Honda Jazz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Holden UTE (305 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 160 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Honda Jazz. (145 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 2003 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Honda Jazz.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Holden UTE 2011 Honda Jazz
Make Holden Honda
Model UTE Jazz
Year Released 2003 2011
Body Type Pickup Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3791 cc 1497 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 204 HP 118 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 6600 RPM
Torque 305 Nm 145 Nm
Torque RPM 3600 RPM 4800 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 5060 mm 3910 mm
Vehicle Width 1850 mm 1530 mm
Vehicle Height 1490 mm 1700 mm
Wheelbase Size 2950 mm 2510 mm