2003 Holden UTE vs. 2012 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2012 Holden Cruze is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Holden UTE. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Holden UTE would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Holden UTE (204 HP) has 43 more horse power than 2012 Holden Cruze. (161 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 2012 Holden Cruze.
Because 2003 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Cruze (360 Nm) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Holden UTE. (305 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Cruze will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Holden UTE.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Holden UTE | 2012 Holden Cruze | |
Make | Holden | Holden |
Model | UTE | Cruze |
Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 204 HP | 161 HP |
Torque | 305 Nm | 360 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4597 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1788 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1477 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2685 mm |