2003 Honda Accord vs. 1982 Zastava 102
To start off, 2003 Honda Accord is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Honda Accord is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Honda Accord (160 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Honda Accord should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Honda Accord weights approximately 623 kg more than 1982 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Honda Accord (192 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 97 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2003 Honda Accord will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Honda Accord | 1982 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Honda | Zastava |
| Model | Accord | 102 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1982 |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 160 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 192 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1393 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2160 mm |
