2003 Honda Fit vs. 1960 Simca Plein Ceil
To start off, 2003 Honda Fit is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Simca Plein Ceil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Simca Plein Ceil would be higher. In terms of performance, 2003 Honda Fit (82 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1960 Simca Plein Ceil. (56 HP @ 200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Honda Fit should accelerate faster than 1960 Simca Plein Ceil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Simca Plein Ceil weights approximately 40 kg more than 2003 Honda Fit.
Because 1960 Simca Plein Ceil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Simca Plein Ceil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Honda Fit, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Honda Fit | 1960 Simca Plein Ceil | |
| Make | Honda | Simca |
| Model | Fit | Plein Ceil |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1960 |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 82 HP | 56 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1060 kg | 1100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1610 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2360 mm |
