2003 Honda Fit vs. 1969 Pontiac GTO
To start off, 2003 Honda Fit is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Pontiac GTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Pontiac GTO would be higher. At 6,548 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Pontiac GTO is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Pontiac GTO (425 HP) has 335 more horse power than 2003 Honda Fit. (90 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Pontiac GTO should accelerate faster than 2003 Honda Fit. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Pontiac GTO weights approximately 340 kg more than 2003 Honda Fit. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 Pontiac GTO is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Pontiac GTO. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Honda Fit, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Honda Fit | 1969 Pontiac GTO | |
Make | Honda | Pontiac |
Model | Fit | GTO |
Year Released | 2003 | 1969 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1496 cc | 6548 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 425 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 104.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79 mm | 95.3 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1060 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 5140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2850 mm |