2003 Honda Fit vs. 1978 Mazda RX-7
To start off, 2003 Honda Fit is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1978 Mazda RX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Mazda RX-7 (105 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2003 Honda Fit. (90 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1978 Mazda RX-7 should accelerate faster than 2003 Honda Fit.
Because 1978 Mazda RX-7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Mazda RX-7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Honda Fit, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1978 Mazda RX-7 (145 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Honda Fit. (131 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 1978 Mazda RX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Honda Fit.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Honda Fit | 1978 Mazda RX-7 | |
Make | Honda | Mazda |
Model | Fit | RX-7 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1978 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1496 cc | 2292 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 105 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 131 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1060 kg | 1060 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2430 mm |