2003 Honda Fit vs. 1991 Lotus Elan
To start off, 2003 Honda Fit is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,588 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Lotus Elan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Lotus Elan (160 HP) has 70 more horse power than 2003 Honda Fit. (90 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1991 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 2003 Honda Fit. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Honda Fit weights approximately 63 kg more than 1991 Lotus Elan.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Lotus Elan (143 Nm) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Honda Fit. (131 Nm). This means 1991 Lotus Elan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Honda Fit.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Honda Fit | 1991 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Honda | Lotus |
Model | Fit | Elan |
Year Released | 2003 | 1991 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1496 cc | 1588 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 160 HP |
Torque | 131 Nm | 143 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79 mm | 79 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1060 kg | 997 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 3810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1240 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2260 mm |