2003 Honda Fit vs. 1994 Volvo 850
To start off, 2003 Honda Fit is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Volvo 850. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Volvo 850 would be higher. At 2,319 cc (5 cylinders), 1994 Volvo 850 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Volvo 850 (240 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 150 more horse power than 2003 Honda Fit. (90 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Volvo 850 should accelerate faster than 2003 Honda Fit.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Volvo 850 (407 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 276 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Honda Fit. (131 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 1994 Volvo 850 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Honda Fit.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Honda Fit | 1994 Volvo 850 | |
Make | Honda | Volvo |
Model | Fit | 850 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1496 cc | 2319 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 240 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 131 Nm | 407 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79 mm | 90 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2670 mm |