2003 Honda Fit vs. 1999 Rover 75
To start off, 2003 Honda Fit is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Rover 75. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Rover 75 would be higher. At 1,991 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Rover 75 (148 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 2003 Honda Fit. (90 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 2003 Honda Fit. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Rover 75 weights approximately 370 kg more than 2003 Honda Fit. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Rover 75 (185 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Honda Fit. (131 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 1999 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Honda Fit.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Honda Fit | 1999 Rover 75 | |
Make | Honda | Rover |
Model | Fit | 75 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1496 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 131 Nm | 185 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1060 kg | 1430 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2750 mm |