2003 Honda Fit vs. 2001 Mazda CU-X
To start off, 2003 Honda Fit is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mazda CU-X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mazda CU-X would be higher. At 1,970 cc, 2001 Mazda CU-X is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Mazda CU-X (99 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 2003 Honda Fit. (90 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Mazda CU-X should accelerate faster than 2003 Honda Fit. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mazda CU-X weights approximately 285 kg more than 2003 Honda Fit. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mazda CU-X (240 Nm) has 109 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Honda Fit. (131 Nm). This means 2001 Mazda CU-X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Honda Fit.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Honda Fit | 2001 Mazda CU-X | |
| Make | Honda | Mazda |
| Model | Fit | CU-X |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1496 cc | 1970 cc |
| Horse Power | 90 HP | 99 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 131 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1060 kg | 1345 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2680 mm |
