2003 Honda HR-V vs. 1953 Riley RM A
To start off, 2003 Honda HR-V is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Riley RM A would be higher. At 1,672 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Honda HR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Riley RM A weights approximately 115 kg more than 2003 Honda HR-V.
Because 1953 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Honda HR-V, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Honda HR-V | 1953 Riley RM A | |
Make | Honda | Riley |
Model | HR-V | RM A |
Year Released | 2003 | 1953 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1672 cc | 1496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 113 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1235 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2870 mm |