2003 Honda Life vs. 1970 Lotus Elan
To start off, 2003 Honda Life is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,556 cc (4 cylinders), 1970 Lotus Elan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Lotus Elan (108 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 2003 Honda Life. (47 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1970 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 2003 Honda Life. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Honda Life weights approximately 90 kg more than 1970 Lotus Elan.
Because 2003 Honda Life is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1970 Lotus Elan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Honda Life will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Honda Life | 1970 Lotus Elan | |
| Make | Honda | Lotus |
| Model | Life | Elan |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1970 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 656 cc | 1556 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 47 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 790 kg | 700 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3410 mm | 3690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1430 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1170 mm |
