2003 Honda Logo vs. 2010 Holden Epica
To start off, 2010 Holden Epica is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Honda Logo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Honda Logo would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Epica (148 HP) has 84 more horse power than 2003 Honda Logo. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 2003 Honda Logo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 212 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Honda Logo. (108 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Honda Logo. 2010 Holden Epica has automatic transmission and 2003 Honda Logo has manual transmission. 2003 Honda Logo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Holden Epica will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Honda Logo | 2010 Holden Epica | |
Make | Honda | Holden |
Model | Logo | Epica |
Year Released | 2003 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1343 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 108 Nm | 320 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2700 mm |