2003 Honda Logo vs. 2012 Aston Martin Virage
To start off, 2012 Aston Martin Virage is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Honda Logo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Honda Logo would be higher. At 5,900 cc (12 cylinders), 2012 Aston Martin Virage is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Aston Martin Virage (490 HP) has 426 more horse power than 2003 Honda Logo. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Aston Martin Virage should accelerate faster than 2003 Honda Logo.
Because 2012 Aston Martin Virage is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Aston Martin Virage. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Honda Logo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Aston Martin Virage (569 Nm) has 461 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Honda Logo. (108 Nm). This means 2012 Aston Martin Virage will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Honda Logo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Honda Logo | 2012 Aston Martin Virage | |
| Make | Honda | Aston Martin |
| Model | Logo | Virage |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1343 cc | 5900 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 490 HP |
| Torque | 108 Nm | 569 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
