2003 Honda S2000 vs. 2005 Renault Clio
To start off, 2005 Renault Clio is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Honda S2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Honda S2000 would be higher. At 2,957 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Renault Clio (252 HP @ 7150 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 2003 Honda S2000. (240 HP @ 7800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 2003 Honda S2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Renault Clio weights approximately 124 kg more than 2003 Honda S2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Renault Clio (300 Nm @ 4650 RPM) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Honda S2000. (220 Nm @ 6500 RPM). This means 2005 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Honda S2000.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Honda S2000 | 2005 Renault Clio | |
Make | Honda | Renault |
Model | S2000 | Clio |
Year Released | 2003 | 2005 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2157 cc | 2957 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 240 HP | 252 HP |
Engine RPM | 7800 RPM | 7150 RPM |
Torque | 220 Nm | 300 Nm |
Torque RPM | 6500 RPM | 4650 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.1 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.7 mm | 82.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.1:1 | 11.4:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1286 kg | 1410 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 3850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 60 L |