2003 Honda Stream vs. 1967 Jaguar 240
To start off, 2003 Honda Stream is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Jaguar 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Jaguar 240 would be higher. At 3,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Jaguar 240 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Jaguar 240 (208 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 2003 Honda Stream. (127 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Jaguar 240 should accelerate faster than 2003 Honda Stream. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Jaguar 240 weights approximately 210 kg more than 2003 Honda Stream. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 Jaguar 240 (300 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 145 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Honda Stream. (155 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1967 Jaguar 240 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Honda Stream.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Honda Stream | 1967 Jaguar 240 | |
Make | Honda | Jaguar |
Model | Stream | 240 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1672 cc | 3442 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 127 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 155 Nm | 300 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 8.1:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1520 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2740 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 54 L |