2003 Honda Stream vs. 1969 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2003 Honda Stream is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1969 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Honda Stream (127 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1969 Nissan Cedric. (114 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Honda Stream should accelerate faster than 1969 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Honda Stream weights approximately 20 kg more than 1969 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1969 Nissan Cedric (165 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Honda Stream. (155 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1969 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Honda Stream.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Honda Stream | 1969 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Honda | Nissan |
Model | Stream | Cedric |
Year Released | 2003 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1672 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 127 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 155 Nm | 165 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2700 mm |