2003 Honda Stream vs. 1991 Lotus Elan
To start off, 2003 Honda Stream is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,672 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Honda Stream is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Lotus Elan (160 HP) has 33 more horse power than 2003 Honda Stream. (127 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1991 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 2003 Honda Stream. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Honda Stream weights approximately 313 kg more than 1991 Lotus Elan.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Honda Stream (155 Nm) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Lotus Elan. (143 Nm). This means 2003 Honda Stream will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Lotus Elan.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Honda Stream | 1991 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Honda | Lotus |
Model | Stream | Elan |
Year Released | 2003 | 1991 |
Body Type | Minivan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1672 cc | 1588 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 127 HP | 160 HP |
Torque | 155 Nm | 143 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94.4 mm | 79 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 997 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 3810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1240 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2260 mm |