2003 Honda Z vs. 2011 SsangYong Rodius
To start off, 2011 SsangYong Rodius is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Honda Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Honda Z would be higher. At 2,696 cc (5 cylinders), 2011 SsangYong Rodius is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 SsangYong Rodius (163 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 2003 Honda Z. (51 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 SsangYong Rodius should accelerate faster than 2003 Honda Z. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 SsangYong Rodius weights approximately 963 kg more than 2003 Honda Z. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Honda Z is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 SsangYong Rodius. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Honda Z will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 SsangYong Rodius (342 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 281 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Honda Z. (61 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2011 SsangYong Rodius will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Honda Z. 2011 SsangYong Rodius has automatic transmission and 2003 Honda Z has manual transmission. 2003 Honda Z will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 SsangYong Rodius will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Honda Z | 2011 SsangYong Rodius | |
| Make | Honda | SsangYong |
| Model | Z | Rodius |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 654 cc | 2696 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 163 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 61 Nm | 342 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 86.2 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 64 mm | 92.4 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1923 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3410 mm | 5130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1920 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 3010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 80 L |
