2003 Hyundai Matrix vs. 2006 Mazda 6
To start off, 2006 Mazda 6 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Hyundai Matrix. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Hyundai Matrix would be higher. At 2,966 cc, 2006 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 6 (215 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 2003 Hyundai Matrix. (104 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 2003 Hyundai Matrix. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Hyundai Matrix weights approximately 96 kg more than 2006 Mazda 6.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda 6 (270 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 126 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Hyundai Matrix. (144 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Hyundai Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Hyundai Matrix | 2006 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Hyundai | Mazda |
Model | Matrix | 6 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2006 |
Body Type | Minivan | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1606 cc | 2966 cc |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 215 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 144 Nm | 270 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1225 kg | 1129 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 68 L |