2003 Hyundai Matrix vs. 2009 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Hyundai Matrix. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Hyundai Matrix would be higher. At 2,179 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Citroen C-Crosser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser (154 HP) has 50 more horse power than 2003 Hyundai Matrix. (104 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser should accelerate faster than 2003 Hyundai Matrix.
Because 2009 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Hyundai Matrix. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser (380 Nm) has 236 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Hyundai Matrix. (144 Nm). This means 2009 Citroen C-Crosser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Hyundai Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Hyundai Matrix | 2009 Citroen C-Crosser | |
| Make | Hyundai | Citroen |
| Model | Matrix | C-Crosser |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1606 cc | 2179 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 154 HP |
| Torque | 144 Nm | 380 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 76.5 mm | 85 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 87 mm | 96 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
